Toggle shoutbox
Shoutbox
|

Football
Started by Tino, Aug 06 2010 09:58 PM
11 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 06 August 2010 - 09:58 PM
Don't actually discuss football teams here. I just have a question about it. Go ahead and move it if you think it should be in the sports section.
Why is a sport where [enter exact high percentage here]% of the time the ball, which isn't a ball, but an egg, is touched with the hands, called football?
Why is a sport where [enter exact high percentage here]% of the time the ball, which isn't a ball, but an egg, is touched with the hands, called football?
#2
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:04 PM
It is about a sports, so I think it's more appropriate in sports.
Basically, rugby was also called football once, and this developed from rugby into another game (which is quite different), but kept the 'football' moniker.
Basically, rugby was also called football once, and this developed from rugby into another game (which is quite different), but kept the 'football' moniker.
#3
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:06 PM
You mean it downgraded from rugby into a different game... not developed...
QUOTE (The Best Matt) |
"blazer posting sexy pictures.. was it tagged as blazzer?"Â |
QUOTE ( Oblivion) |
Seraphiroth is over rated |

#4
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:07 PM
I don't know... Then why is that sport where you actually use your feet 100% of the time (except Suarez, he likes mixing it with handball) also called football?
I blame the Americans.
I blame the Americans.
#5
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:08 PM
Except that "Soccer" was coined by a british man
QUOTE (The Best Matt) |
"blazer posting sexy pictures.. was it tagged as blazzer?"Â |
QUOTE ( Oblivion) |
Seraphiroth is over rated |

#6
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:10 PM
I thought there was a thread for this.
And I've played rugby before...it's fun, but I don't like it more than American Football, hell no.
I don't know why it's called Football, but I personally love all the depth at each individual position of each individual team, and everything that goes on. The positions are all different and each player has way different qualities and strengths even though they play the same position. It's great, and you CAN break it down like that.
And I've played rugby before...it's fun, but I don't like it more than American Football, hell no.
I don't know why it's called Football, but I personally love all the depth at each individual position of each individual team, and everything that goes on. The positions are all different and each player has way different qualities and strengths even though they play the same position. It's great, and you CAN break it down like that.

Gallery
I will not remove this until the Vikings win the Super Bowl - Started 1/28/11
"i had to google bukkake."
-Boney
#7
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:11 PM
#8
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:13 PM
QUOTE (Seraphinox @ Aug 7 2010, 12:06 AM) |
You mean it downgraded from rugby into a different game... not developed... |
That's a matter of opinion.
lol Suarez, nice Tino xD
And Shu, most sports have players with different qualities in each position

#9
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:14 PM
American football is played like a series of advertising jingles, while football is played more like jazz XD
QUOTE (The Best Matt) |
"blazer posting sexy pictures.. was it tagged as blazzer?"Â |
QUOTE ( Oblivion) |
Seraphiroth is over rated |

#10
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:22 PM
Well yeah, but it goes deeper than that.
Like at running back, example.
Adrian Peterson is without a doubt one of the best power runners in the world. The issue with him is that he fumbles, way more than any other back in the pros.
Which is why we had Chester Taylor at second string. He's good enough to be a starter for many other teams, and he's had more experience than Peterson, so he dosen't fumble the ball really ever. So we can put him in and also get production out of that position. He can also double as a reciever, adding another threat the defensive players need to take care of. However, he dosen't have the power or speed of Peterson, so he isn't the starter.
Minnesota Vikings, btw.
Like at running back, example.
Adrian Peterson is without a doubt one of the best power runners in the world. The issue with him is that he fumbles, way more than any other back in the pros.
Which is why we had Chester Taylor at second string. He's good enough to be a starter for many other teams, and he's had more experience than Peterson, so he dosen't fumble the ball really ever. So we can put him in and also get production out of that position. He can also double as a reciever, adding another threat the defensive players need to take care of. However, he dosen't have the power or speed of Peterson, so he isn't the starter.
Minnesota Vikings, btw.

Gallery
I will not remove this until the Vikings win the Super Bowl - Started 1/28/11
"i had to google bukkake."
-Boney
#11
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:39 PM
But the same still happens in sports like football and basketball, for similar reasons.
#12
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:48 PM
Maybe, but the depth adds because there are seperate teams for Defense and Offense...that's a crapload of positions. I think it adds to the fun, too, because again your packages are different, so you can utilize not only the starters, but the second and third string players as well. So backups aren't just backups.

Gallery
I will not remove this until the Vikings win the Super Bowl - Started 1/28/11
"i had to google bukkake."
-Boney
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users