|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kaiser.
Posted 03 April 2009 - 12:50 AM
You know what I mean, unless I have not made myself clear. DnD dragons, or FE Dragons, or whatnot. If you're just going to use "maybe" dragons were dinosaurs "you" can't prove it wrong, then fine. All mythical creatures existed because the human mind conceived it. Prove me wrong.
| QUOTE (Ryrumeli) |
| Yeah, that is what we get. Never mess with Kensai. XD |
| QUOTE (badkiara103) |
| Who doesn't want to kill a helpless little girl. |
Mega Member
Posted 03 April 2009 - 12:52 AM
| QUOTE (Holy_kensai @ April 02, 2009 08:50 pm) |
| @ Mankut, Thought as much, and since you're the creator, do you consider Dragons as a mythical/mystical creature? @ Wraith and Suzaku, I still say dragons did NOT exist. Dragons =/= to Dinosaurs, and bearded dragons/Komodo Dragons are not Dragon Dragons. You know what I mean, unless I have not made myself clear. DnD dragons, or FE Dragons, or whatnot. If you're just going to use "maybe" dragons were dinosaurs "you" can't prove it wrong, then fine. All mythical creatures existed because the human mind conceived it. Prove me wrong. |
Kaiser.
Posted 03 April 2009 - 12:56 AM
| QUOTE (Ryrumeli) |
| Yeah, that is what we get. Never mess with Kensai. XD |
| QUOTE (badkiara103) |
| Who doesn't want to kill a helpless little girl. |
Mega Member
Posted 03 April 2009 - 12:58 AM
| QUOTE (Holy_kensai @ April 02, 2009 08:56 pm) |
| Yes, I understand that, but I'm saying I'm referring to a different type of dragon. You know, the mythical type. And also, consider this. All language was created by a crazy guy going around pointing at stuff and saying "Rock!" "Bird!" and whatnot. |
Kaiser.
Posted 03 April 2009 - 01:01 AM
Back on topic, Minotaurs are pretty cool too.
| QUOTE (Ryrumeli) |
| Yeah, that is what we get. Never mess with Kensai. XD |
| QUOTE (badkiara103) |
| Who doesn't want to kill a helpless little girl. |
Song of Death
Posted 03 April 2009 - 02:21 AM
| QUOTE (Holy_kensai @ April 03, 2009 01:50 am) |
| @ Mankut, Thought as much, and since you're the creator, do you consider Dragons as a mythical/mystical creature? @ Wraith and Suzaku, I still say dragons did NOT exist. Dragons =/= to Dinosaurs, and bearded dragons/Komodo Dragons are not Dragon Dragons. You know what I mean, unless I have not made myself clear. DnD dragons, or FE Dragons, or whatnot. If you're just going to use "maybe" dragons were dinosaurs "you" can't prove it wrong, then fine. All mythical creatures existed because the human mind conceived it. Prove me wrong. |
Gender Non-Conformist
Posted 03 April 2009 - 02:19 PM
| QUOTE (Suzaku @ April 03, 2009 12:52 am) |
| their ******* name has dragon, so they are a dragon, no dumbass would just put a dragon in a animal's name just to be "lol, I put DRAGON" |
Song of Death
Posted 03 April 2009 - 02:38 PM
| QUOTE (Leo @ April 03, 2009 03:19 pm) | ||
Turtle Dove. Spider Monkey. Bull Frog. Let's get some things straight. Dragons arcording to mythology never existed. Dinosaurs did exist, though. Dinosaurs and humans never existed concurrently. There's a 65 million year gap. Myths are no proof for existence. Nothing is capable of breathing fire. Certain beetles can spirt poison. |
Gender Non-Conformist
Posted 03 April 2009 - 05:02 PM
| QUOTE (wraith89 @ April 03, 2009 02:38 pm) |
| Where are you getting this 65 million year stuff? If you say C14 dating, it doesn't work as promised because the radioactivity only lasts for a couple of thousands of years anyhow. Why is it that different cultures have cave paintings or statues or buildings with inscriptions of dinosaur like figures on them? I don't feel like talking about this right now though, but lol, turtle dove, spider monkey, and bull frog... bull frogs are very dangerous to the ecosystem, especially from where I'm from. But those examples don't work because the animal they actually are is the suffix, not the prefix... and dragon is the suffix... meaning whatever else was there describes the dragon... because the animal is a "dragon". |
Song of Death
Posted 03 April 2009 - 05:18 PM
| QUOTE (Leo @ April 03, 2009 06:02 pm) |
| 65 milllion years is the generally accepted date of the end of the KT extinction. This is backed up by so much proof that denying it is pointless. C14-dating is only used on organic samples, so it cannot be applied to Dinosaurs (seeing as fossils are no longer organic). Other methods are used to date these ages accurately. Even without these sophisticated methods it's obvious Dinosaurs fossils are millions of years old, simply because it takes that long to make fossils. No human bones have been around a fraction of the time needed. Paintings mean little. After all there's thousands of paintings of Vishnu, Shiva etc. Are you also trying to say the Hindu god's exist? Komodo Dragons exist, obviously. I'm arguing against the existence of dragons arcording to mythology. Also: You Australian? They really hate Bull Frogs.... |
Gender Non-Conformist
Posted 04 April 2009 - 12:08 PM
| QUOTE (wraith89 @ April 03, 2009 05:18 pm) |
| Believe it or not there isn't any proof of the earth being that old. It is really bias from 'scientists' who fix the facts to match their theory instead of fixing their theory to match up with the facts. I'd really love to see these so-called proofs. An example of a curious case: if dinosaurs did indeed live 65 million years ago, pray tell me, how is it that red blood cells were found intact within these fossils? Blood cells definitely do not last 65 million years old... which is a well known fact. And no, I'm not saying Hindu gods existed or anything, but you do realize these are pictures of dinosaurs... and if men knew how dinosaurs looked like, they must have seen each other, unless these people had crazy imaginations and happened to know how a Stegosaurus looked like. And yes, unlike Hindu deities, dinosaurs did exist (and some still may live today... like the Mokele-Mbembe in the Congo swamps). Dragons in mythology were very much based off real dinosaurs, so I put them under the same category despite mythological dragons being... well... exaggerated. But they're one and the same. Flying? Check. Fire-breathing? Check. Ferocious? Check... albeit some being friendly hence Chinese dragons being kind and all... And crickey! I'm no Australian... I'm Korean, although I'd love to see Australia in some part of my life. |
The Greatest
Posted 04 April 2009 - 03:28 PM
| QUOTE (Leo @ April 04, 2009 01:08 pm) |
| lol, at Mokele-Mbembe in a serious debate. Do you also believe in the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot and the Yeti? |
Song of Death
Posted 04 April 2009 - 05:00 PM
Whiney Fucking Bitch
Posted 05 April 2009 - 04:40 AM
The Greatest
Posted 05 April 2009 - 07:55 AM
| QUOTE (Aya-Tsuki @ April 05, 2009 05:40 am) |
| I'm still finding it hard to believe this thread is arguing dragons to be real and not mythical |
\nn/ >.< \nn/
Posted 05 April 2009 - 07:33 PM
Kaiser.
Posted 05 April 2009 - 08:50 PM
| QUOTE (Ryrumeli) |
| Yeah, that is what we get. Never mess with Kensai. XD |
| QUOTE (badkiara103) |
| Who doesn't want to kill a helpless little girl. |
Pro Lurker
Posted 05 April 2009 - 10:53 PM
Whiney Fucking Bitch
Posted 06 April 2009 - 01:36 AM
The magical fox variation. (Since Kitsune are real as that is what foxes are referred to in japanese)
LIGHTS Super-fan
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:27 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
