there was something else here before, but it was kinda really rude sounding. and i though of a better way to put it anyway.
Basically what's going on is i wasn't looking at him objectively. i don't really pay attention to stuff like what you described blazer, so really all i have is personal experience. my experience with roy is that he's powerful. if i did look at him objectively i'm sure i'd see the same flaws you did. either way i'm so far out of my league in this conversation. honestly i don't have any place trying to argue against what you're saying, and should have thought better of it before i did. so i apologize for that.
just to clarify i do know that for glory isn't a good test of skill or anything, but it's better than nothing when it comes to trying out something new.
I getcha. no need to be sorry man, you didn't do anything wrong. you're right about For Glory, it's probably better than nothing. I think perhaps we looked too much into what you were saying. it wasn't meant to be so crazy detailed, I think. so sorry for that, we (or at least I) may have gotten carried away. hopefully it's all good 
