52 replies to this topic

[Golden Warrior]

QUOTE (Holy Kensai @ Apr 28 2012, 08:20 PM)

Maybe Harry Potter style. Like, a bunch of self-contained adventures all adding to a big adventure.

That sounds brilliant, but, what game would it be basing off of from the series? Dark Dragon? I really don't think certain games would work to your specific idea...

[AbsolutelyTotalSilence]

FE6 as a movie would be "march around and kill stuff" for the most part.
FE: Shadow Dragon & Blade Of Light would be too generic.

FE9, 10 or 7 would probably work best.

[Golden Warrior]

QUOTE (AbsolutelyTotalSilence @ Apr 29 2012, 05:22 PM)

FE6 as a movie would be "march around and kill stuff" for the most part. FE: Shadow Dragon & Blade Of Light would be too generic.

Those two are exactly what I meant.

QUOTE (AbsolutelyTotalSilence @ Apr 29 2012, 05:22 PM)

FE9, 10 or 7 would probably work best.

FE7 not as much, but FE9-10 might work best if a movie were to be made.

[Ristau]

Did anyone else notice how much of a fat ****ING necro this was? I also doubt that it could be decent, and you can read what others have said #TooLazyToContinue

[Holy Kensai]

First off. No one cares Ryoku. Activity is activity.

Second off. Just arrange it so that the movies are like, the many parts of Roy or Marth or someone going through the different stages of the game. So like first movie is Roy's castle being destroyed, him escaping, and growing up. And so forth.

Third off, FE9 and FE10 suck. Stop pretending they are good games.

[Fire Blazer]

QUOTE

Third off, FE9 and FE10 suck. Stop pretending they are good games.

B-b-b-b-ut I like pretending!

>____>

I actually agree though, if they didn't have the name "Fire Emblem" in it I'd probably hate them

[Holy Kensai]

QUOTE (Blazer @ May 17 2012, 09:10 PM)

QUOTE Third off, FE9 and FE10 suck. Stop pretending they are good games. B-b-b-b-ut I like pretending! >____> I actually agree though, if they didn't have the name "Fire Emblem" in it I'd probably hate them

Exactly. Hate it when games sell because of the brand and people defend them even though they are horrible.

[Golden Warrior]

But the game had good features! Ok, the game did suck compared to the other ones, regardless of features of any sort at all. [s]Everything in the slash talk is my actual opinion.[s]

But, still, that doesn't say anything about a movie. I still think that a movie would turn out OKAY, if it had a good plot and the right type of scenes. I can't really specify what types though...

[Lancer]

I liked FE10's gameplay...
And FE9's...

Though storywise 10 was meh, and character wise both were kinda bleh :|

But I did like FE9's plot. Maybe cause I was in 6th grade when I finished it, it was the coolest thing to me at the time. Though I still like the FE9 plot.

And Mist. My heart will always hold a place for that little underrated valkyrie girl who happens to be the sister of Sigurd's reincarnation Ike.

[Falaflame]

Hey stop bashin on FE9, it's not that bad. However FE10's easily the bane of the title "Fire Emblem".

[Golden Warrior]

Ok, screw peer pressure, I'm gonna be completely honest here.

I liked FE9 and FE10. I liked them ALLOT. There, I said it. I like both games, despite the fact that FE10 had a disgustingly weird plot, I like it. It's not the features or the game-play, as those are both just FE in general.

What I like is the NEW things brought into the game. Items, music, especially Laguz. Those were the only games to have Laguz and I really like Laguz. The music is just amazing. The items are great too! Who would have ever thought that they'd make a forge feature. Those games started the forge feature that we see in almost all the games after it thus far!

That's all I have to say.
/endwalloftextrant

So look for the positive, not the negative.

[Rujio]

I really like FE10, myself, and I enjoyed what I played of FE9.

[Golden Warrior]

^ That. Was epic. Well, people have different opinions.

... Wait, this is off-topic, this is about a possible movie... Whatever.